Jimenez’s’ strange perception of sexuality

The following is an excerpt from Principal David Jimenez’s testimony at the 3020a of John Silvers.

Respondent’s lawyer: Mr Silvers continued to request that Mr. Albetta not observe him isn’t that correct.

Jimenez: yes he did continue

Respondent’s lawyer with regard to his request did He iindicate the reason Mr. Albetta not observe him.

Jimenez: Yes I remember very clearly the reason.

Respondent’slawyer Okay he indicated to you that he (Silvers) felt Mr. Albetta.

Jimenez No he said that he didn’t like Mr. Albetta because Albetta was not a man and he always reminded me of that he told me from the beginning of  from the very beginning he always used that expression. ” I told you I didn’t like that guy. I did not like him he doesn’t man up. He false and I tried to get out of him a specfic reason  and he wouldn’t tell me it was some type of mysterious he was just not a man and his issues with his relationship–Mr. Albetta’s relationship with Mr. Hernandez. Something bothered him about Mr. Alberta’s relationship with Mr. Hernandez their closeness. Complained about Mr. Alberta’s going drinking with Mr. Hernandez after work. Being so chummy chummy. That’s what I remember to me it was ridiculous that hr would ask such a thing.

Respondent’s lawyer Well he (Silvers) did indicate to you and I think you testified previously as well as just now that he had issues with Albetta’s truthfulness isn’t that correct?

Jimenez: That was much later that was after OEO.

Respondent’s lawyer  Okay so in October 2010 Mr. Silvers did indicate to you that he had issues with Mr. Albetta’s truthfulness isn’t that correct?

Jimenez He was alluding to his sexuality

Respondent’s Lawyer: Well that was your interpretation

Jimenez It was pretty– yes it was my interpretation

Respondent’s Lawyer : Right because he ( Silvers) never said aanything about Alberta’s sexuality during that October 2010 meeting He just said he’s not a man he won’t man up. Right?

Jimenez To me that was about his( Albetta’s) sexuality.

RL: To you it was about his sexuality

Jimenez YeahI

RL   You received the OEO report that was issued June of 2011 Is that correct

jimenez : Yes

Respondent’s’ lawyer : And you noted that OEO disagreed with you about what the phrase” man up, be a man, you’re not a man meant. They disagreed with you about what that meant isn’t that correct?

Jimenez That they disagreed I would have to look at the report.

Respondent’s lawyer Okay So you don’t recall whether or not OEO indicated that those phrases were not in and themselves indicative of any bias regarding sexuality.

Jimenez i was there and it was my opinion and that what I testified to OEO ,I’m testifying now that the I felt that it had something to do with sexuality with Mr. Albetta’s sexuality.


Jimenez Oh Okay 


Jimenez My understanding of my reading of the report was that OEO could not substantiate that that was about Albetta’s sexuality. But not that they disagreed with me  that they I already thought it was wrong but they just couldn’t substantiate that. Basically I–



3 thoughts on “Jimenez’s’ strange perception of sexuality

  1. Albetta’s not a man. He’s a reptile. Cold blooded snake in the grass.

    Jimenez is an alien. Doesn’t even understand yes or no questions.

    Not sure if they are eligible for Hell but if they are. STAMP THAT ONE WAY TICKET BABY. (By baby I am NOT CALLING YOU GAY MR HIMENEZ)

  2. Pingback: Student’s safety not at Manhattan Center | voltaire280's Blog

  3. Pingback: Quality Review | voltaire280's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s